ACR Chair Discusses Partnership for America’s Health Care Future

Geraldine McGinty, MD, MBA, FACR, chair of the ACR Board of Chancellors, contributed this post.

Geraldine McGinty_MGF1866The ACR’s core purpose is “To serve patients and society by empowering our members to advance the practice, science and professions of radiological care.” As I said in my November 2019 JACR® column, “empowered imaging professionals’ practice of medicine is structured to support them in delivering the highest standard of care to the patients in whose diagnosis or treatment they are privileged to participate.”

What is critical to empowering our members is the ability to have a voice in the regulatory process that governs our practice and the reimbursement that sustains it. The decision that your American College of Radiology® (ACR®) leadership made to participate in the Partnership for America’s Health Care Future was predicated on the imperative to preserve that voice.

Our US health care system can, for some, be the best in the world, and yet we know that for others it is far from that. The debate on how to reform how we deliver and pay for health care is not new, but has taken on new momentum with the discussion of a more comprehensive role for the government variously called “single payer” or “Medicare for All.” As we trend towards spending 20% of our national output on a system that does not always deliver the outcomes we might hope for, we need to do better. Opinions, not surprisingly, vary on how to do that. What is critical is that we as radiologists continue to be part of the decision-making process.

As such, after much thought and a unanimous vote of the ACR’s Board of Chancellors, the decision was made to support and participate in the Partnership in May 2018. That decision has been reviewed since and will likely be reviewed again as we get closer to the election, and pending any discussion on the Council floor at the Annual meeting. ACR participation followed extensive discussion and deliberation, and has been discussed in the press, on social media and on the ACR website. 

The Partnership, comprised of stakeholders throughout the American health care system, is a coalition pledged to support federal policies that build on the strength of employer-provided health coverage, a delivery system based on our current multi-private payers, while preserving federal programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and other proven solutions that hundreds of millions of Americans depend on. All in the Partnership are committed to legislative solutions to fill in the gaps where they exist — to expand access to affordable, high-quality coverage for all Americans.

The ACR and its members work to provide for the best radiologic care possible, and we support policies that expand access to these services. Like any nonpartisan health care association, the ACR advances policies to benefit patients and members without allegiance to a single political party or a party’s specific policy platform. The ACR wants to work together with other stakeholders to lower costs, protect patient choice, expand access, improve quality and foster innovation. For these reasons, we have worked for decades to ensure the appropriate utilization of diagnostic imaging services.

Polling shows that a single payer system is actually not attractive to the public once they learn the specifics of its cost ($32 trillion) and the potential for increased patient wait times and provider reimbursement cuts — estimated by CMS (figure 1) and others at 40 percent vs private plans. Studies and news reports have discussed the widely accepted view that the services and hospitals likely most affected would be in rural and underserved areas.

We are on the brink of an exciting era, when artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning will empower advancements that all Americans must be able to access. However, advanced technologies may be rationed in a single payer system — stifling the ability to improve patient care with innovative tools and treatments.

As our specialty demands unique expertise and touches virtually every part of patient care, radiology must take a leadership role. This involves engaging with other stakeholders in many venues — including The Partnership.

ACR leadership, chosen by College membership and tasked with executing the policies voted on by Council, welcomes and relies on member involvement and good faith input to represent the best interests of our members and those they serve.

We are all in this together — as we consider our ongoing involvement in The Partnership — and the myriad challenges we will face in the months and years to come.

3 thoughts on “ACR Chair Discusses Partnership for America’s Health Care Future

  1. Automatic coverage for all plus programs that anyone (it will cost of course so be for those people or businesses that can afford it) is the best system that I can think of. Choice cannot be taken away from Americans.

  2. The ACR should not be actively funding a lobbying group that is working to actively shape public opinion against universal healthcare. This pits radiologists against patients and it a shameful look for ACR, especially as other medical groups including the AMA voted against joining this group.

  3. It is so encouraging to see ACR members speak against our membership in PAHCP.

    Respectfully Dr McGinty, your blogpost espouses the same bullet points used by PAHCP which are misrepresented. For example, the $32 trillion cost of single payer over 10 years by the Urban Institute is based upon their assumption of a 6% administrative cost. This assumption is contrary to the experience of the current Medicare system which is 2%, thereby inflating the cost of this proposal. Also the UI report ignores the savings for hospitals and physician practices with a single streamlined billing practice. Even the Lewin Group, a consulting firm owned by United Health Care acknowledges these savings.

    Without getting ‘into the weeds’ the point is misinformation is damaging to any meaningful discussion and misinformation, not solutions are the essence of PAHCF. Perhaps missed, but when I visit the PAHCF website, I see no mention of policy, or structure for policy development that would truly move the conversation forward.

    I hope that the Board of Chancellors will revisit this issue at the next quarterly meeting

Leave a Reply to Dominic Frecentese MD Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s